Today I saw an interesting post by Dan Holloway: We Need to Talk About World Intellectual Property (IP) Day. Have a read. He gives some real examples where IP affects decisions. As an ex-librarian (subject and enquiry desk) I used to come across those and others daily. As a full-time writer I also come across them daily, though often from a slightly different angle.
It's a topic I sometimes blog about or touch upon, as in these posts:
- Copyright Restrictions On Books
- Licensing And Collecting Societies
- Images, Book Covers, (Stock) Photo Sites, And Scams
- Where To Buy Books - Secondhand Is Valid
I'll add some examples to Dan's:
- I hate the way that as writers we self-censor all the time, worrying about mentioning real world places, events and brands.
- I hate the way that things which should have passed into public domain get their copyright extended because rich corporations can pressure law makers for exceptions and extensions.
- I hate the way copyright on classic works of art has expired - but you end up not being able to re-use that work because a gallery or museum manages to restrict it.
- I hate the way that there might be stories and characters in the public domain (fairy tales and so on), yet you have to be careful because companies like Disney may have used those names and stories in works they have then copyrighted and trademarked, meaning you then have to be careful how you use things that should be available to all.
- I hate the way trademarks are allowed to use and restrict common words (and in some cases images, fonts, colours).
- I take a photo I want to use - but maybe one of the buildings in it is protected or restricted and I am infringing in some way?
- I record a video and it shows logos and images in the background, maybe a poster, which is copyright with reproduction forbidden, perhaps exacerbated by music playing from a nearby TV which is also copyrighted.
One of the reasons I can't join some organisations (writing or licensing) is because they campaign for even more and tighter copyright laws - which is the opposite of what I want. I can't register with a licensing society (even if I wanted to) because I allow people to do more with my work than their licence would if I signed up, and I don't want to restrict people.
For all these reasons, and more, I would support simpler, clearer, and more open intellectual property laws, with far more cases where things are unequivocally okay. And that's speaking as an author.